Just three weeks after Kate Lampard CBE was asked to intervene by Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, she determined that there was no flaw in the way the DoH and Speaking Out team had handled my claim, interview etc. and determined my civil rights in this matter, this is despite the fact that the Speaking Out inquiry team, categorically did not have the powers within their remit to determine criminal or civil liability, this is stated in the document used to set up the inquiry and repeated in the document below.

Considering how busy Kate must be, and the volume of documents involved in my case by this time, to reconsider my case in this timeframe I consider was impossible, so it is likley she simply gave my case lip service, rather than reconsideration.

After this, Jeremy hunt and Fabian Hamilton dropped interest.

This is the legislation set up for the inquiry, and the section I wanted Kate to look at in detail.

The report of the investigation into matters relating to Savile at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

https://www.leedsth.nhs.uk/assets/Uploads/030c7dfb5e/40482-LIBRA-main-accessible-v2.3.pdf

Page 222

6

Review past and current complaints and incidents concerning Jimmy Savile’s behaviour at any of the hospitals owned or managed by LTHT and its predecessor bodies including:

a where the incident(s) occurred;

b who was involved;

c what occurred;

d whether these incidents were reported at the time and whether they were investigated and appropriate action taken.

The investigation does not have the power to impose disciplinary sanctions or make findings as to criminal or civil liability. Where evidence is obtained of conduct that indicates the potential commission of criminal offences, the police will be informed. Where such evidence indicates the potential commission of disciplinary offences, the relevant employers will be informed.